<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Iran on CrossGov.com</title>
    <link>https://crossgov.com/tags/iran/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Iran on CrossGov.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://crossgov.com/tags/iran/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Congress Needs a Verifiable Account of What the Iran Strikes Achieved</title>
      <link>https://crossgov.com/congress-needs-a-verifiable-account-of-what-the-iran-strikes-achieved/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://crossgov.com/congress-needs-a-verifiable-account-of-what-the-iran-strikes-achieved/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A military campaign can produce extensive destruction without producing a settled answer about what an adversary can still do. That distinction matters whenever an administration asks Congress and the public to accept a declaration of success. Targets struck, facilities damaged, weapons remaining and production capacity restored are different measurements. Treating them as interchangeable makes oversight weaker precisely when the consequences are greatest.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;https://pxef.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/iran-strikes-claims-assessments-verification.png&#34; alt=&#34;Comparison of White House claims about Iran&amp;rsquo;s missile arsenal with DIA assessments of remaining weapons, alongside differing nuclear program descriptions, IAEA inspection gaps and congressional reporting options.&#34; title=&#34;Iran Strikes Claims Assessments and Verification Gaps&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
